top of page
Search

Las Vegas Metro Police Try to Eliminate the Ability to Sue for "Negligent" Excessive Force in Serious Cases, Limit Liability to "Intentional" Acts Only

Writer: Adam Breeden
Adam Breeden
2 hours ago
2 min read

Cover image: Illustration

When an officer uses force, can a family sue only for intentional wrongdoing, or can they also argue the officer was careless? Las Vegas Metro's position in a pending case would close the second option.

In K.C. v. LVMPD, Metro officers shot and killed Keith Childress Jr. on December 31, 2015, believing he had a gun. He was holding a black phone. After the first shots, officers fired a second volley while he lay on the ground, and a police dog bit him for fifteen seconds.

The family brought federal claims and a state negligence claim. The trial judge would not let the jury consider whether the shootings themselves were negligent, following an Arizona rule that negligence cannot rest on an officer's intentional use of force. Metro argues that rule should apply in Nevada: in its view, negligent conduct and intentional conduct are separate, so a deliberate use of force cannot be "negligent." The effect is to limit claims about an officer's force to intentional-conduct theories only. Even with the shootings excluded, the jury found the officers 25% negligent and awarded $150,000, which was reduced to $0 under Nevada's comparative-fault rule.

On January 2, 2026, the Ninth Circuit asked the Nevada Supreme Court two questions: Can a negligence claim be based on an officer's intentional use of force? And is "reasonable care" under Nevada law the same as "reasonableness" under the Fourth Amendment? Federal judges in Nevada have split on both. California allows these negligence claims; Arizona does not.

Why it matters: federal civil rights claims face hurdles like qualified immunity, which does not apply to state-law claims. Negligence also looks more broadly at how officers handled an encounter, not just the final moment force was used. If Nevada adopts Metro's view, that path narrows for families.

The case is pending, and no one can predict the result. Our firm is not counsel in this case.

If you or a loved one was hurt by police in Nevada, call Breeden Malpractice & Injury Law at 702-819-7770 to discuss your options.

This post is general information, not legal advice.

 
 
 

Comments


logo1.png

Contacts

Practice Areas

Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Religion 
Right to Bear Arms
Bad Traffic Stops
Inmate Claims
Discrimination
Police Excessive Force

Freedom from Search and Seizure
Due Process of Law
Freedom from Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Anti-Discrimination
Police Brutality
Open/Public Records Act or FOIA

  • facbook
  • Untitled design (11) copy
  • Layer 7 (1)

Fax:
(702) 819-7771

© 2026 Breeden & Associates, PLLC | Sitemap

Nevada Civil Rights.com is operated by Breeden & Associates, PLLC and Nevada attorney Adam J. Breeden

bottom of page